Prepare

Learn Institutional Procurement Basics

This stage outlines several factors that may constrain how an institution or its food service management company purchases food.
  • Public & Private
  • FSMC & Self-Operated
Prepare: 

Understand Food Service Management Strategies: Food Service Management Companies vs. Self-Operation

Institutions operate under one of two food service management models: self-operated or operation by a food service management company. Self-operated institutions manage all food operations internally, also known as “direct purchasing.” Institutions that work with a food service management company outsource some or all of their food management operations to that company. While these two operation methods provide distinct advantages and disadvantages, both can provide opportunities to incorporate values-based procurement into an institution’s food purchasing. 


FSMC-Operated Institutions

A food service management company (“FSMC” or “management company”) is an external organization that manages some or all of an institution’s food service operations, including sourcing, purchasing, and preparation.

Outsourcing can lower internal staffing demands and often lowers costs because of the large scale on which management companies operate and their affiliations with group purchasing organizations. [61] Additionally, many management companies provide data management systems that can track food purchasing metrics.

However, management companies vary in their ability to incorporate values-based purchasing. [62] Some require institutions to buy from their approved vendor lists, which may not align with an institution’s values or food purchasing guidelines. [63] Because of this, an institution should incorporate its values-based purchasing expectations into its requests for proposals and final contracts with the management company.

Notably, management companies administering a public institution’s food operations are subject to procurement laws because they acquire goods on the institution’s behalf using public funds. Accordingly, applicable thresholds and solicitation requirements still apply. [64] An institution may want to incorporate in contracts both requirements to comply with applicable procurement laws and internal requirements.


Self-Operated Institutions

Self-operated institutions handle their own food sourcing, purchasing, preparation, and service, giving them greater flexibility to work directly with values-aligned vendors. [65] However, increased flexibility and control require more internal personnel and administrative capacity. To address this, external collaboratives can provide support, including resources for food service operators and opportunities to collaborate with other institutions. [66]

Without a management company contract to structure procurement practices, self-operated institutions must proactively incorporate values-based principles into their operations, making clear food purchasing guidelines essential.

Except for the legal framework that applies to public institutions, the key features and priorities for incorporating values-based procurement into food operations—such as clearly defined roles, strong data management systems, and attention to the vendor landscape—are similar for both private and public self-operated institutions. The key features and special considerations below provide more guidance for self-operated institutions incorporating values-based procurement into their food purchasing.

Applicable Laws & Procedures

The same legal and procedural framework applies to public institutions regardless of their management strategy. However, since self-operated institutions may have a greater ability to enter into smaller-scale procurement contracts, there is a greater opportunity for self-operated public institutions to utilize small purchases and avoid the technical requirements of formal procurement processes.

Self-operated private institutions are not subject to procurement law, but will need to be aware of internal goals, policies, and procedures to ensure compliance with their values-based procurement program.

Team Roles & Responsibilities

No matter whether the self-operated institution is public or private, for values-based procurement to be most successful, it is important to be sure that the institution’s personnel are covering key roles and responsibilities. These roles should be clearly defined and internally recognized.

Data Collection & Management

An institution must track progress to effectively implement and evaluate values-based procurement efforts. There are many ways that institutions and management companies can track relevant data. A self-operated institution should determine how it prefers to measure and record purchasing. Typically, institutions track by volume or total dollar amount spent. Additionally, it is prudent to track other metrics based on the values identified in the institution’s food purchasing guidelines. For example, how much purchased food qualifies as “local” or “sustainable,” and how many vendors meet the institution’s other purchasing priorities.

Existing Vendor Landscape

To implement values-based purchasing practices, both public and private self-operated institutions will need to assess the existing vendor landscape to determine the availability of values-based vendors that can meet the institution’s food needs. More information on types of values-based vendors is included later on in this section of the Toolkit. 

Footnotes

[61] Setting the Table for Success: A Toolkit for Increasing Local Food Purchasing by Institutional Food Service Management, Farm to Inst. New England, https://www.farmtoinstitution.org/food-service-toolkit#3-institutional-purchasing-101.

[62] To learn more about how the values-aligned procurement processes of different management companies compare, see Hannah Louie, Beyond Nutrition: A Landscape Analysis of Values-Based Procurement Among Food Service Management Companies, Johns Hopkins Ctr. Livable Future (Oct. 2019), https://clf.jhsph.edu/sites/default/files/2019-10/a-landscape-analysis-of-values-based-procurement-among-food-service-management-companies.pdf. Setting the Table for Success: A Toolkit for Increasing Local Food Purchasing by Institutional Food Service Management, Farm to Inst. New England, https://www.farmtoinstitution.org/food-service-toolkit#3-institutional-purchasing-101.

[63] Setting the Table for Success: A Toolkit for Increasing Local Food Purchasing by Institutional Food Service Management, Farm to Inst. New England, https://www.farmtoinstitution.org/food-service-toolkit#3-institutional-purchasing-101.

[64] 7 CFR § 226.21.

[65] Lauren Tonti, Food for Thought: Flexible Farm to School Procurement Policies Can Increase Access to Fresh, Healthy School Meals, 27 Health Matrix: J. Law-Medicine 463, 487 (2017), https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/healthmatrix/vol27/iss1/16/.

[66] See, e.g., Association for Healthcare Food Service, https://healthcarefoodservice.org/.